The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court today rebuked the Reserve Bank of India for asking the
National Company Law Tribunal in its June 13 directive to give priority to the
insolvency proceedings against companies with huge debts.
It
also questioned the functioning of the central bank.
The
bench of Justice S G Shah came down heavily on the RBI for stating in its press
release dated June 13, 2017 that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
proceedings against companies with outstanding dues of more than Rs 5,000 crore
“will be accorded priority by NCLT.”
Essar
Steel had moved the high court challenging the RBI order to banks.
The
court also questioned the “functioning” of the RBI for its decision to issue
the press release in which it had directed banks to initiate insolvency
proceedings against defaulting companies.
“The
RBI has to be careful while issuing press releases, it must be in consonance
with the Constitutional mandates, based upon sound principles of law, but in
any case should not be in the form of advise, guidelines or directions to
judicial or quasi-judicial authorities in any manner what so ever,” the court
said in its order.
Further
reacting to the central bank’s submission that it has no document on record
based on which the decision to issue press release was taken, the court said,
“This goes to show the manner in which the RBI is functioning, in as much as
there is a press release even without a decision at certain level that press
release is to be published and what should be included in such press release.”
“This
is also an equally serious issue. It has been conveyed to the respondents that
on such disclosure that there is no other document, pursuant to such
disclosure, now, they would be debarred from relying upon any such document, if
any,” it added.
The
court interpreted RBI’s statement in its press release that “such cases (for
insolvency proceedings) will be accorded priority by the NCLT” that the
tribunal “has to give priority to cases filed by the directives of RBI against
the cases, which are filed by other creditors or petitioners before the NCLT.”
The
RBI even tendered an apology to the court saying that the statement was made
due to “poor drafting” of the press release, and even issued corrigendum on
July 8, to delete the line.
Through
in a press release dated June 13, the RBI had directed banks to launch IBC
proceedings against companies with outstanding dues of more than Rs 5,000
crore, and for other NPAs, banks should finalise resolution plans in the next
six months.
During
its submissions, the central bank had apologised from the court for issuing
that statement in the press.
Essar
Steel had moved the high court seeking the court’s direction to quash the RBI’s
direction to the banks to initiate insolvency proceedings against it.
Comments
Post a Comment